Criteria
|
|
1 (Below
Expectation) |
2 (Poor) |
3
(Satisfactory) |
4 (Good
to Excellent) |
|
Organization |
Sequence of
information is difficult to follow. |
Reader has
difficulty following work because student jumps around. |
Student presents
information in logical sequence which reader can follow. |
Information in
logical, interesting sequence which reader can follow. |
|
Content Knowledge |
Student does not have
grasp of information; student cannot answer questions about subject. |
Student is
uncomfortable with content but is able to demonstrate basic concepts. |
Student is at ease
with content, but fails to elaborate. |
Student demonstrates
full knowledge or more than required. |
|
Grammar and Spelling |
Work has four or more spelling
errors and/or grammatical errors. |
There are three misspellings
and/or grammatical errors. |
There are no more than two
misspellings and/or grammatical errors. |
There is one or no misspelling(s)
and/or grammatical error(s). |
|
Critical
Thinking |
Argument
lacks logic; examples are inappropriate or missing. |
Argument
is based on weak, uneven logic with some inappropriate examples. |
Argument
is based on moderate logic, with appropriate examples and with some lapses in
organization, but not so many that the main point is lost. |
Argument
is based on sound logic, evidenced by clear organization and appropriate
examples. |
|
References (If applicable) |
Work displays no references. |
Work does not have the appropriate
number of required references. |
Reference section was completed
with some errors. |
Work displays the correct number
of references, written correctly. |